Papers, Books, Book Chapters, Abstracts

2002

Papers

  1. Analysis of reasons for attending or not attending continuing education lectures via telemedicine

    Krupinski E, Lyman T, Barker G, Lopez AM, Weinstein RS. Analysis of reasons for attending or not attending continuing education lectures via telemedicine. Telemedicine J e-Health 8: 252-3, 2002.

  2. Clinical applications in telemedicine/telehealth

    Krupinski EA, Nypaver M, Poropatich R, Ellis D, Safwat R, Sapei H. Clinical applications in telemedicine/telehealth. Telemed J e-Health, 8(1): 13-34. 2002.

  3. Telemedicine vs. in-person dermatology referrals: An analysis of case complexity

    Krupinski EA, Barker G, Rodriguez G, Engstrom M, Levine N, Lopez AM, Weinstein RS. Telemedicine vs. in-person dermatology referrals: An analysis of case complexity. Telemed J e-Health, 8(2): 143-7. 2002.

  4. Practical methods of color quality assurance for telemedicine systems

    McNeill KM, Major J, Roehrig H, Krupinski EA. Practical methods of color quality assurance for telemedicine systems. Medical Imaging Technol, 20(2): 111-6. 2002.

  5. Telesurgical Presence and Consultation for Open Surgery

    Rodas EB, Latifi R, Cone S, Broderick TJ, Doarn CR, Merrell RC. Telesurgical Presence and Consultation for Open Surgery. Arch Surg; 137:1360-1363, 2002.

Abstracts

  1. Expense comparison of a telemedicine practice versus a traditional practice

    Barker G, Krupsinski EA, McNeill KM, Shellenberg B, Weinstein RS. Expense comparison of a telemedicine practice versus a traditional practice. Telemedicine J e-Health 8: 190, 2002.

  2. Teleradiology driving network expansion. Recent experiences on the Navajo Reservation

    Carroll M, McNeill KM, Yazzie H, Holcomb MJ. Teleradiology driving network expansion. Recent experiences on the Navajo Reservation. Telemed J e-Health, 8(2): 221. 2002.

  3. Effect of camera resolution and bandwidth on facial affect recognition

    Cruz M, Cruz RF, Krupinski E, McNeely R, Weinstein RS. Effect of camera resolution and bandwidth on facial affect recognition. Telemedicine J e-Health 8: 246, 2002.

  4. Lost opportunities for revenue in telemedicine practices?

    Krupinski EA, Barker G. Lost opportunities for revenue in telemedicine practices? Telemedicine Journal & e-Health, 8, 253. 2002.

  5. Homehealth versus homehealth/telehomehealth: an evaluation of oncology patients with ostomies

    Lopez AM, Krupinski EA, Bohnenkamp SK, McDonald P. Homehealth versus homehealth/telehomehealth: an evaluation of oncology patients with ostomies. Telemedicine Journal & e-Health, 8, 242. 2002.

  6. Innovative uses of the tele-home unit in health care

    Lopez AM, McDonald P, Lazarus S, Major J, Weinstein RS. Innovative uses of the tele-home unit in health care. Telemedicine J e-Health 8: 254, 2002.

  7. Telecolposcopy in underserved communities

    Lopez AM, Kurker SF, Guillen J, Major J, Hatch K, Barker G, Garcia F, Lazarus S, Weinstein RS. Telecolposcopy in underserved communities. Telemedicine J e-Health 8: 254, 2002.

  8. Womens health care via telemedicine

    Lopez AM. Women’s health care via telemedicine. Telemed J e-Health, 8(2): 201. 2002.

  9. An Arizona clinical encounters costing model for telemedicine services updat

    McNeill KM, Barker GP, Weinstein RS. An Arizona clinical encounters costing model for telemedicine services update. Telemedicine J e-Health 8: 195, 2002.

  10. The Telemedicine Network as an Engine for Sustainability

    McNeill KM, Barker GP. The Telemedicine Network as an Engine for Sustainability. Telemedicine Journal & e-Health, 8:210. 2002.

  11. What works awards

    Weinstein RS, McNeill KM. What works awards. Arizona Telemedicine Program. Health Manag Technol May 23(5):22, 2002.

Share this